Lack of reproducibility in science causes significant issues
Science retracted (without lead author's consent) a study of how canvassers can sway people's opinions about gay marriage
Original survey data was not made available for independent reproduction of results (and survey incentives misrepresented, and sponsorship statement false)
Two Berkeley grad students attempted to replicate the study and discovered that the data must have been faked.
Lack of reproducibility in science causes significant issues
From the authors of Low Dose Lidocaine for Refractory Seizures in Preterm Neonates (doi:10.1007/s12098-010-0331-7:
The article has been retracted at the request of the authors. After carefully re-examining the data presented in the article, they identified that data of two different hospitals got terribly mixed. The published results cannot be reproduced in accordance with scientific and clinical correctness.
Source: Retraction Watch
Lack of reproducibility in science causes significant issues
Any work you do to make your analysis more reproducible pays dividends for colleagues and your future self.
Jeremy Leipzig
Mission: To train researchers in the best practices and approaches of reproducible research
More generally, accelerating scientific progress through reproducible science.
Peng, R. D. “Reproducible Research in Computational Science” Science 334, no. 6060 (2011): 1226–1227
Provenance with results pasted into manuscript:
Curriculum is suitable for both.
Day 1, morning:
Day 1, afternoon:
Day 2, morning:
Day 2, afternoon:
On popular demand: Github
We chose R because it is
However, those not familiar with R struggle with R's syntax and get frustrated.
The Markdown sources, and the HTML, are hosted on Github: https://github.com/Reproducible-Science-Curriculum/bosc2015
The repository is archived on Zenodo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17844